|
Issue 109Nov / Dec 2009ContentsnewsMuseum calls for fund to study treasure finds Missing Stonehenge circle did not come from Preselis with Important revision to Stonehenge bluestone theory Found: "The great lost monument of Cambridge" featuresNevern Castle – Castell Nanhyfer Tracking Hunters and Gatherers on the Continental Limits with Bibliography Remembering the Great War with Lutyens lettersyour views and responses on the webCaroline Wickham-Jones looks at excavation websites Matt Ritchie introduces Forest Heritage Scotland CBA CorrespondentDon Henson looks at the Marsh Award shortlist
ISSN 1357-4442 Editor Mike Pitts |
newsNews is written by Mike Pitts Museum calls for fund to study treasure findsThe discovery of an exceptional prehistoric hoard in 2005 delighted archaeologists in Cornwall. But money for writing up the excavation, and for analysis and display of the hoard, is still being sought, highlighting the challenges that treasures found by detectorists can bring to museums. The hoard, from Mylor near Falmouth, consists of 33 Sompting type, socketed copper alloy axes, that had been freshly cast, packed into a pot and buried in a pit dug for the purpose. The axes date from the Llyn Fawr late bronze/early iron age transition (800–650BC). This is the first such hoard found in south-west Britain – and the largest of any bronze age hoard from Cornwall. Many different hoards have been found across the UK, but very few have been professionally excavated. After finding two axes, Paul Burgess and Harry Manson phoned Anna Tyacke, the Portable Antiquities Scheme's local liaison officer, at the Royal Cornwall Museum, Truro, on a Saturday morning. Matt Mossop of Archaeological Consultancy Ltd, realising that the discovery was already becoming well known, mounted an immediate excavation. The finders pinpointed the site with metal detectors, and the archaeologists dug a 1.1×1m trench. The axes, protected by an earth plug that had fallen in after the decay of a cover (possibly leather), sat in a loose packing of bracken. Laura Ratcliffe, former conservator at the RCM, extracted soil from inside the axes in the museum laboratory and conserved the hoard. She says seeds, insects, caterpillars, grass and twigs also survived, promising rare insights into the local environment at the time of burial. But there are no funds to analyse these or the metals, or provide a critical radiocarbon date. The Cornwall Archaeological Society has given Mossop £100 to write up the dig. "It's not all about money", he told British Archaeology, "but it would be good if we could be paid something". The finders and landowner received £8,500 (the greater part coming from the Headley Trust). Nobody questions their right to this, or the professional way in which they reported the hoard. But at the RCM, funding cuts by the Museums, Libraries and Archives council have led to the loss of 14 jobs – including the conservator's. "If the hoard was found today", says Jane Marley, curator of archaeology and world cultures, "the museum would have to raise £4,000 for Ratcliffe to work as a freelance conservator. What is needed", she adds, "is a grant fund for the conservation, analysis and publication of treasure finds". Missing Stonehenge circle did not come from PreselisA new theory about the Stonehenge bluestones is set to divide geologists and archaeologists, and open new inquiries into how and why the famous stones reached Stonehenge. The site's megaliths are traditionally classed into two groups, sarsens (a local sandstone) and bluestones. While the former, at an estimated total weight of 1,700–1,800 tonnes, outscale the 250-odd tonnes of the latter, the bluestones have dominated debate. The issues of where they came from and how they reached Stonehenge, have polarised into two widely divergent views:
Most prehistorians believe people moved the stones. This was what geologist Herbert Thomas proposed, when he first identified the Preselis as the origin in 1920: a view endorsed by geologists including Christopher Green and James Scourse, and recently by archaeologists Timothy Darvill and Geoffrey Wainwright, who claim to have found quarry outcrops and "sacred springs" at the source of the megaliths around Carnmenyn. Geologist George Kellaway proposed in 1971, by contrast, that the bluestones had been transported by a glacier. This view has been supported by archaeologist Aubrey Burl, and (in a differing glacial interpretation) an Open University team of geologists including Olwen Williams-Thorpe. Last year the latter wrote on a BBC Timewatch blog that the bluestones "are a rag-bag mix... from all over south Wales", and Brian John published The Bluestone Enigma (see Books in the printed magazine). Now geologists Rob Ixer (University of Leicester) and Richard Bevins (National Museum of Wales) are proposing a third option. They say many bluestones came not from Pembrokeshire, but from "a far wider and, as yet, unrecognised area or more likely areas" – perhaps north Wales (Snowdonia, the Llyn Peninsula and Anglesey), or even beyond. The well-known spotted dolerite, is a Preseli rock, they say – but Carngoedog was the likely source, not Carnmenyn. These conclusions derive from a new study of thousands of Stonehenge rock specimens: from near the west end of the Cursus earthwork (where a lost bluestone circle has been proposed), collected in 1947 and excavated by the Stonehenge Riverside Project in 2006/08; and from Stonehenge, excavated by Mike Pitts in 1979/80 and Darvill and Wainwright in 2008. The geologists also found the Cursus bluestones, which are all rhyolitic and mainly tuffaceous (with no Stonehenge dolerites), had significant mineralogical differences from visually similar rocks at Stonehenge. The Darvill and Wainwright excavation produced significant amounts of a type of rhyolite or rhyolitic tuff "not recorded in north Pembrokeshire and noticeably absent in the Mynydd Preseli area". How the stones were moved, Ixer told British Archaeology, "is an archaeological problem", though he wondered if "different groups [of people] brought different stones?" Ixer and Bevins's detailed study will be published in the 2009 Wiltshire Studies. In WS 2006, Ixer and Peter Turner suggested that the Stonehenge Altar Stone (the largest bluestone) came from an unidentified source far from Milford Haven – the traditional attribution said to indicate where the Preseli stones were taken downriver and out to sea by Neolithic gangs. Since this news item was published, a number of developments occurred which have altered the theories. See below for the updated item. Important revision to Stonehenge bluestone theoryIn the News pages of the Nov/Dec 2009 issue of British Archaeology, it is reported that new petrographical work by Rob Ixer (University of Leicester, Department of Geology) and Richard Bevins (National Museum of Wales) had suggested that some of the Stonehenge bluestones had not come from Pembrokeshire, but (in Ixer's words) from "a far wider and, as yet, unrecognised area or more likely areas". As the magazine was being printed, however, Bevins was out in the field, and found an apparent source for the rocks in question north of the Preselis. Ixer and Bevins have kindly written this interim note on this latest development. Stilpnomelane-bearing rhyolites/rhyolitic tuffs at Stonehenge are most probably from the Preseli Hills regionField and petrographical work continues on new Stonehenge lithics and on in situ material from areas around the Preseli Hills. This includes excavated material from the Avenue at Stonehenge, and rocks from undistinguished outcrops in the low ground north of Mynydd Preseli, close to Pont Saeson. The former, as expected, conformed to the range of lithologies seen throughout Stonehenge. But the latter had surprising results, and has led to our radically modifying our proposal that many of the bluestones do not have a Preseli Hill origin, but have an unknown and possibly non-southern Welsh origin. In thin section the Pont Saeson fine-grained acidic rocks show most of the features of our class of Stonehenge rocks, informally called "rhyolite with fabric", including a lensoidal fabric and the presence of stilpnomelane. Despite nearly a century of collecting and analysis, this is the first record of this mineral in rhyolitic rocks in south Wales. The only previous recorded occurrences of stilpnomelane in acidic rocks in Wales are from the Cregenen granophyre in the Cadair Idris area of southern Snowdonia, and in granophyric rocks of the St David’s Head Intrusion, in north-west Pembrokeshire. Although not an exact match for the Stonehenge rocks, the Pont Saeson lithics strongly suggest that the "flinty rhyolite/rhyolite with fabric" found in the excavations at Stonehenge has an origin in the Preseli region, and that there is no longer a need to look further north in Wales for this important class of Stonehenge debitage. The other and more abundant unusual rock-type (carrying distinctive titanite-albite inter-growths) from the Great Cursus area (but not so far identified at Stonehenge) is still unprovenanced, and its petrography has still yet to be matched with rocks from south Wales, or indeed from the rest of Wales. An interim summary of where we now believe the Stonehenge bluestones come from, and incorporating these new data, is:
Rob Ixer & Richard Bevins Found: "The great lost monument of Cambridge"Two teenage boys, trespassing on their bikes in a disused Cambridge quarry, found some human bones. Further investigation established that they had inadvertently alerted archaeologists to the survival of part of a major iron age hillfort believed completely destroyed. The site at Limekiln Hill, recently acquired by the Wildlife Trust with a view to public opening, was perched at the top of a dangerous chalk pit. A section of ditch was all that remained of a circular enclosure around 150m across, known as War Ditches. There had been excavations there on many occasions between 1893 and 1962. Yet, says Oxford Archaeology East which has conducted a rescue dig at the site funded by English Heritage, the monument's date and exact location were still uncertain. OAE's Richard Mortimer told British Archaeology that the 4m-deep ditch had been dug in the fourth or third centuries BC, and the site reoccupied around 50BC–0AD after a period of abandonment. Within two centuries it had been flattened. In the press |
CBA web:British ArchaeologyJan/Feb 2005Mar/Apr 2005 May/Jun 2005 Jul/Aug 2005 Sep/Oct 2005 Nov/Dec 2005 Jan/Feb 2006 Mar/Apr 2006 May/Jun 2006 Jul/Aug 2006 Sep/Oct 2006 Nov/Dec 2006 Jan/Feb 2007 Mar/Apr 2007 May/Jun 2007 Jul/Aug 2007 Sep/Oct 2007 Nov/Dec 2007 Jan/Feb 2008 Mar/Apr 2008 May/Jun 2008 Jul/Aug 2008 Sep/Oct 2008 Nov/Dec 2008 Jan/Feb 2009 Mar/Apr 2009 May/Jun 2009 Jul/Aug 2009 Sep/Oct 2009 Nov/Dec 2009 Jan/Feb 2010 Mar/Apr 2010 May/Jun 2010 Jul/Aug 2010 Sep/Oct 2010 Nov/Dec 2010 Jan/Feb 2011 Mar/Apr 2011 May/Jun 2011 Jul/Aug 2011 Sep/Oct 2011 Nov/Dec 2011 CBA BriefingFieldwork CBA homepage |