|
Issue 110Jan / Feb 2010ContentsnewsBurnt mound theory tested to perfection Dig find proves flowers placed in bronze age graves UK's first complete Roman lantern found in Suffolk Research continues as Saxon hoard is valued at £3.3m featuresNewhenge: Latest discoveries and interpretations from the Stonehenge Riverside Project team Dig the beat: Exploring pop music from an archaeological perspective, including additional online content THE BIG DIG Mellor: A hillfort in the garden: This long-running research excavation near Stockport, Greater Manchester, is now ready for publication The Peat Men from Clonycavan and Oldcroghan: Findings of the Bog Bodies Research Project at the National Museum of Ireland, with Bibliography lettersyour views and responses on the webCaroline Wickham-Jones looks at archaeological gifts Dan Pett summarises the website set-up and technologies for the Staffordshire Hoard spoilheapfaux pas scienceSebastian Payne asks what cremation burials can tell us in viewGreg Bailey is impressed by Open University broadcasting CBA CorrespondentLynne Walker and Sue Morecroft look at the past year of listed building casework my archaeologyDavid Attenborough remembers the early days of television
ISSN 1357-4442 Editor Mike Pitts |
scienceCremated – but not silencedSebastian Payne, chief scientist at English Heritage, extols the value of ancient human remains that until recently were little considered. It is easy to think that you cannot learn much from cremated bone. But appearances are misleading, and in the past decade there have been significant advances in working with this material. When a body is cremated, the bones shrink, distort and break up, making it hard to identify a high proportion of the pieces. It is harder to tell male from female, because shrinkage is unpredictable; and hard to age adults closely because tooth crowns have shattered and other age indicators are scarce. But unexpectedly, unerupted tooth crowns often survive in good condition, so cremated children can sometimes be aged more closely. Cremation deposits can tell us much about the funerary ritual. The lack of soil reddening at the burial site shows that cremation usually happened elsewhere. Signs of more than one individual in a burial suggest use of regular pyre sites: when bone fragments were gathered, bits of older cremations were included by accident. Usually a cremation deposit has much less bone than we would expect. An adult cremation typically produces around 2kg of bone, but at Roman Godmanchester, for instance, the average adult cremation deposit weighed a little under 800gm. The size of cremation deposits was unrelated to urn capacity, and less variable than one might expect – it seems people had a clear idea of what was an appropriate amount of bone. Firing temperature was often unexpectedly high. Colour provides a very rough guide: black or brown bone suggests around 300–400°C and incomplete burning, while white or bluish bone suggests over 650–800°C. Bone cremated at higher temperatures has larger crystals of hydroxyapatite – the phosphate mineral which is the main crystalline component of bone. At Anglo-Saxon Mucking (Essex), crystal size indicated cremation at temperatures above 650°C; blobs of melted glass on bones suggested they sometimes exceeded 940°C. Some 300–500kg of wood is needed to cremate a human body, and so most of the charcoal recovered in cremation deposits is likely to be from fuel. At Roman Brougham (Cumbria), alder charcoal was more commonly found with men and birch with women and children. Prunus charcoal (cherry, sloe, plum etc) was commoner where there was other evidence that the cremation had been a grand affair. Remains of personal objects, plants or animals (presumably from food offerings) are often found with the human remains. Anglo-Saxon cremation burials might include horse remains, while Roman pyres are more likely to have featured chickens and pigs. Cremated bone can be reliably radiocarbon dated. At first sight this is very surprising. The inorganic carbonate in unburnt bone usually gives dates that are much too young, presumably because younger carbon is incorporated by recrystallisation or secondary crystallisation of carbonate in the bone. For this reason, inhumations are dated using the carbon in the collagen; as collagen burns, it had long been assumed that you cannot date cremations. However, consistent and reliable results have been confirmed after a decade of dating cremated bone. The original explanation was that the inorganic part of bone, known as bioapatite, incorporates a small amount of carbonate in the crystal lattice; it was argued that some of this carbonate remains after cremation, and could be dated. Current research, however, is suggesting that it is carbon dioxide that is being dated, absorbed either from the pyre environment or later from the atmosphere as the bone cools. Whatever the case, the dates appear to be reliable. A number of major dating projects in Britain, Ireland and elsewhere in Europe are in progress using cremated bone. Thanks to Gill Campbell, Tom Higham, Simon Mays and Fay Worley. More scienceP Naysmith et al, in Radiocarbon (2007), 403–08 M Van Strydonk et al, in Lunula Archaeologia Protohistorica 13 (2005), 3–10. |
CBA web:British ArchaeologyJan/Feb 2005Mar/Apr 2005 May/Jun 2005 Jul/Aug 2005 Sep/Oct 2005 Nov/Dec 2005 Jan/Feb 2006 Mar/Apr 2006 May/Jun 2006 Jul/Aug 2006 Sep/Oct 2006 Nov/Dec 2006 Jan/Feb 2007 Mar/Apr 2007 May/Jun 2007 Jul/Aug 2007 Sep/Oct 2007 Nov/Dec 2007 Jan/Feb 2008 Mar/Apr 2008 May/Jun 2008 Jul/Aug 2008 Sep/Oct 2008 Nov/Dec 2008 Jan/Feb 2009 Mar/Apr 2009 May/Jun 2009 Jul/Aug 2009 Sep/Oct 2009 Nov/Dec 2009 Jan/Feb 2010 Mar/Apr 2010 May/Jun 2010 Jul/Aug 2010 Sep/Oct 2010 Nov/Dec 2010 Jan/Feb 2011 Mar/Apr 2011 May/Jun 2011 Jul/Aug 2011 Sep/Oct 2011 Nov/Dec 2011 Jan/Feb 2012 CBA BriefingFieldwork CBA homepage |