NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE SCOTLAND
There have been many exciting early prehistoric discoveries in
Scotland in recent years - the extensive settlement of Barnhouse in Orkney,
the Holywood cursus complex near Dumfries, the Den of Boddam flint
mines in the North East, and the Rotten Bottom bow from the Borders.
All are of great significance for understanding the early settlement
of Britain, and together with the extensive excavation of more
familiar monuments, provide a picture of early Scotland unimaginable
to previous generations. These sites are often very well preserved
by southern English standards, and many of the new sites have
been radiocarbon-dated, ensuring a chronology to be envied by
other countries.
Patrick Ashmore, a Principal Inspector of Ancient Monuments at
Historic Scotland, has been closely involved in many of these
projects and is largely responsible for the dating programme.
He is therefore well placed to summarise the mate rial and has
provided an exciting and innovative overview. The new dated sites form the backbone of the book,
and they have been arranged into periods of 500 years, providing the
basis for each chapter. This objective view of developments raises
interesting points but also creates problems. The reliance on
securely dated sites means that many of the classic sites of Scottish
prehistory have been ignored - even though many provide an unparalleled
insight into prehistoric behaviour. There is still nothing to
compare with the settlement sequence at Jarlshof or the mortuary
rituals of Midhowe, and yet these
sites only appear on the periphery of the narrative.
Each chapter is organised as a tour of Scotland, starting in the
Northern Isles and moving around the country in a clockwise direction.
This tends to result in a repetitive description of sites which
are very similar, and the book would have benefited from a more
thematic approach. Nevertheless, it provides a useful introduction
to the riches of Scottish prehistory.
Niall Sharples, formerly an Inspector at Historic Scotland, is a Lecturer in Archaeology at the
University of Wales, Cardiff
NEW-BORN CHILD MURDER
In the 18th century, many illegitimate children had to be supported
at the expense of the parish. The hostility of local tax-payers, coupled
with the moral shame of bearing a bastard child, gave every incentive
for such pregnancies to be concealed and the child secretly murdered.
In this book about 18th century women accused of infanticide,
Mark Jackson's main source of evidence is court records from northern
England. He discusses the law during the period, examines ways
in which women fell under suspicion and how cases
were brought to court, and considers aspects of court procedure
and evidence. He also discusses (and tries to explain) differing
contemporary attitudes towards women accused of this crime.
Given the surreptitious nature of the act, witnesses were rare,
so the prosecution was generally forced to rely on circumstantial
evidence. The difficulties this presented led to the passing of
a statute in 1624, by which if the mother could be shown to have
concealed the death of the child then this alone was enough to
convict her of its murder. By the 18th century, the 1624 act was
widely seen as draconian by the courts, and in practice prosecutors
still had to prove that the baby was born alive and that the accused
had murdered it. Medical evidence played an increasing part in
trials - bodies were examined for signs of violence, and autopsies
were performed to try and establish whether the child was born
alive or dead. Despite the prominence given to medical testimony
it was recognised at the time to be generally inconclusive, so
it often helped the defence more than the prosecution. This is
reflected in a strikingly low level of convictions (less than
five per cent). The sympathy shown by the judiciary and many medical
writers towards accused women was not, however, mirrored in their
communities. Neighbours, particularly women, were often very hostile.
Despite being based on a PhD thesis, this book is well-written,
and Jackson - a Lecturer in the Wellcome Unit for the History
of Medicine at Manchester - leavens it with plenty of examples
to illustrate his points.
Dr Simon Mays, a Human Skeletal Biologist at English Heritage, has studied infanticide in the
Roman period
A FESTIVAL OF NORFOLK ARCHAEOLOGY
The Norfolk & Norwich Archaeological Society is one of the
oldest in the country and has recently celebrated its 150th anniversary
with, amongst other events, the publication of this collection
of essays summarising recent archaeological discoveries in the
county. This book does not attempt to be a comprehensive county
history; but the idea of looking at the entire time-scale of
the region's history through its material remains, with only one
essay dealing with written records, is new and exciting.
Environmental archaeology shows that arguably the most important
event in man's history - the change from nomadic hunting to sedentary
farming - was a gradual one, taking place from the Late Palaeolithic
and through the Mesolithic periods. We often associate prehistoric
archaeology with ritual and burial sites, but this book explores
recent discoveries which help us understand the economy and settlement
patterns of the county. What is clear is that Norfolk was a wealthy
area, where gold and bronze objects of
fine workmanship continue to be found. In the post-Roman period,
it has long been evident from place-names that Viking influence
was important, particularly in the east, but it is only through
recent finds - both the lowly possessions of Scandinavian farmers
and the finer ones of the military élite - that we begin
to understand the real extent of the Viking contribution to the
history of Norfolk.
The continued wealth of the county, suppporting a high population
through the Middle Ages, can be studied through its rich legacy
of church architecture and the remains of long-abandoned villages.
The period after 1700 is also approached through its landscape
and buildings, and the archaeological method of studying country houses and their
parks is particularly rewarding in a county with three of the
most important 18th century examples still standing (Houghton,
Holkham and Wolterton). Industrial archaeology may not usually
be associated with a `rural' county, but Norfolk contributed to
industrial progress in a number of ways, such as flax manufacture
and cement production.
This is a refreshing group of essays that perhaps shows the way
that collecting information for county histories may go in the
future.
Susanna Wade Martins is the author of `A History of Norfolk' (Phillimore, 1984)
Return to the British Archaeology homepage
© Council for British Archaeology, 1997
Dates, dates and a few odd omissions
by Niall Sharples
PJ Ashmore
Batsford, £15.99
ISBN 0-7134-7531-5 pb
Infanticide and law in the 18th century
by Simon Mays
Mark Jackson
Manchester, £35.00
ISBN 0-7190-4607-6 hb
Norfolk's archaeology through the ages
by Susanna Wade Martins
eds Sue Margeson, Brian Ayres and Stephen Heywood
Norfolk & Norwich Arch Soc, £7.99
ISBN 0-952-8119-0-1 pb