Participating in the Past: Problems with the Limited Perception of Archaeology as ‘Digging Things Up’

3.3 Problems with the Limited Perception of Archaeology as ‘Digging Things Up’

Over the years, many organisations (including the CBA) have striven to counterbalance the view that ‘digging things up’ is what archaeology is about, by promoting a broader view of all aspects of the historic environment, its study and conservation. Nevertheless, several respondents commented on this continuing mismatch between perception and reality. It is of course a campaign which is never going to be won outright since the public at large, and probably all archaeologists, have at some time or another, been entranced by the process, or results of excavation. Commercial rewards apart, the thrill of discovery also lies behind the popularity of metal detecting.

Although the media has often been helpful in showing some of the behind-the scenes aspects of excavation, at the core of many popular archaeology programmes lies a hole in the ground. Although few will deny the excitement of discovery, although one respondent said that he had observed that some full-time archaeologists seem reluctant to admit to it, the downside of the common media (and public) perception, is that the numerous other means of exploring, understanding and conserving the past, seem in contrast to be devalued.

The emphasis on excavation has had a considerable impact on the volume of public demands for participation, discussed below. However, there was also a perception among respondents that professional organisations could be more forthcoming in encouraging and supporting local groups in other local fieldwork activities.

When underwater archaeology is covered in the media it is commonly in the context of spectacular discoveries of commercial value or disputes over damage caused by non-archaeological salvage methods. One respondent drew attention both to the practical difficulties of public participation but also to presentational difficulties in this area which are exacerbated by the shortage of suitably qualified practitioners to manage, research and interpret the underwater cultural heritage.